Troy, Michigan · Independent · Not affiliated with the District

What do you actually want from
Troy School District?

Four questions, in your own words. Your answers come to me, a Troy resident — not to the District — and I'll publish what I learn. The questions are right below; the District's own budget documents are at the foot of the page if you want them.

Why I'm asking, and what I'm putting behind it

Turnout for the August 4 school funding vote was 36.6%. Board meetings draw a few dozen people out of a district of roughly 12,000 students. Decisions worth tens of millions of dollars are being made in near-silence. I'd like to change that a little, and I'm willing to pay for the privilege of your attention: a $100 Amazon gift card drawn at random from everyone who leaves contact details, and $500 to the Troy Foundation for Educational Excellence regardless of what the responses say. Both explained at the foot of the page.

Aggregate results go up on this site after the survey closes and go to the Board of Education. Your actual words are only passed on if you tick a box — off by default — and your contact details are never published or shared either way.

Survey opens
Aug 5
2026
Closes
Oct 22
12 days before the election
General election
Nov 3
Tuesday, 2026

Closing 12 days before the election is deliberate. The results are meant to inform how people think about the District, not to land as an October surprise with no time to argue with it.

Question 1 of 4
What is your impression of Troy School District?

Whatever comes to mind. Your own experience, your kids' experience, what you hear from neighbors, what you thought when you moved here versus what you think now. There's no wrong answer and nothing is being scored.

0 characters
Question 2 of 4
What do you want from Troy School District?

Not what you think is realistic — what you actually want. Academics, class sizes, buildings, communication, discipline, transportation, special education, athletics, how money is spent, how decisions get made. If you could change one thing, what would it be?

0 characters
Question 3 of 4
Do you agree with how the District budgets, with what it chose to cut, and should it enroll more students who live outside Troy?

Three things at once — answer any part of it, or say the framing is wrong; that's useful too.

On the third one: Troy can admit students from other districts, and is paid by the state for each one. The District calls this Schools of Choice, or Section 105/105c — same thing. It currently does this only in a few grades and buildings.

The District's own documents for each are at the foot of this page, collapsed so they're there if you want them and out of the way if you don't: the FY2027 budget, all 37 proposed cuts, and what an out-of-district student is actually worth — the state pays Troy $10,300 a year for one, which a rule almost nobody mentions makes $786 less than it gets for a resident in the same chair.

0 characters
Question 4 of 4
Outside of school, what are you paying for to support your child's learning — and roughly how much does it come to in a year?

Tutoring, Kumon or Mathnasium, test prep, enrichment or summer programs, online courses and learning apps, a private evaluation, a coach for one subject — anything you pay for to build or reinforce academic skills. Two things are useful: what they're actually doing, and a rough dollar figure per child, per year. A ballpark is fine; I'm not after receipts.

"Nothing" is just as useful an answer. The picture only comes out wrong if the families who spend are the only ones who reply.

I ask because it is the clearest measure there is of where families feel they have to fill a gap themselves — and it appears in no budget document anywhere.

0 characters

Contact — entirely optional

Leave this blank and I have no idea who you are: your answers arrive with no name and no way to reach you, and they count the same. Leaving it blank also means you are not in the gift card drawing, because I'd have no way to tell you that you'd won.

You'll verify a mobile number below, but that is not this. It is used to send one code and is never stored — see the note by that box. It is not a way to contact you and it is not written down anywhere I could read.

Whatever you put here is used for exactly two things: the drawing, and following up if you asked me to. It is never published, never sold, never shared with the District or anyone else, and it is deleted after the drawing unless you asked to be kept in touch.

Who may see what you wrote

This is entirely your call, and it is the only thing on this page I'd ask you to read twice. Nothing is shared with anyone unless you tick the box.

What each choice actually means

 TickedBlank
Counted in published totalsYesYes
Read by meYesYes
Given to candidates & the DistrictAnonymizedNo
Quoted in the write-upAnonymizedNo
Your name or contact attachedNeverNever
In the gift card drawingDepends only on whether you left contact details — not on this box

"Anonymized" means what it says. Your name, email, phone and address never leave my hands — not to candidates, not to the District, not to anyone. If a response contains a detail that would identify you even without a name ("I'm the parent who spoke at the March 17 meeting"), I'll cut it or leave the response out entirely rather than risk it.

Leaving the box blank costs you nothing. Your answer still counts in every number I publish, and I still read it — it just doesn't get handed onward. And if you change your mind in either direction later, email me and I'll act on it.

Verify a mobile number

One text with a six-digit code. It's how I can say that every response came from a different real person, which is the difference between a survey worth showing the Board and a comments section.

Your number is not stored

Not encrypted, not partially masked — never written down at all. What's kept is a scrambled fingerprint of it that cannot be turned back into a number, salted with a key that lives on the server and not in the database. It cannot be used to text you, it can't be sold, and it isn't a phone book even to me. The number itself exists for the few seconds it takes to send the code, then it's gone.

Send it

One quick check that you're a person, and that's it. Nothing on this page sets a tracking cookie or follows you between visits.

The material behind these questions

Everything below is the District's own — its budget, its list of proposed cuts, its Schools of Choice deck — plus the arithmetic I did on top of it. It's collapsed because you shouldn't have to read a budget to answer a question about your kids' school. Open whatever you're curious about; every figure is sourced and every document is reproduced in full.

Where things stand, in four numbers

Turnout, the deficit, the enrollment trend, and the District's own three scenarios.

You don't need any of this to answer questions 1 and 2. It's here because question 3 asks you about specific decisions, and you should be able to see them.

Aug 4 millage
Failed
48.99% yes countywide · 42.91% in Troy
Revenue that didn't arrive
$8.1M
per year, budgeted in two of three scenarios
FY2027 reduction target
$12M
plus $7M in FY28 and $7M in FY29
Enrollment, FY26 → FY29
−582
12,069 → 11,487 projected FTE
August 4, 2026

Oakland County voters rejected the Oakland Schools regional enhancement millage — 1.5 mills for six years — by 6,703 votes: 163,120 yes (48.99%) to 169,823 no (51.01%), all 395 precincts reporting. In the City of Troy the margin was wider: 8,821 yes (42.91%) to 11,736 no (57.09%).

Troy School District had built $8,100,000 a year of enhancement millage revenue into two of the three four-year scenarios it showed the Board on July 22. Those two scenarios are now off the table. The remaining one — Scenario 1 — is the plan.

The District's own three scenarios

Presented to the Board of Education, July 22, 2026. Fund balance as a percentage of expenditures is the District's headline solvency measure; the Board's informal floor has been in the mid-teens.

General Fund, fund balance as % of expenditures
ScenarioReductions FY27 / 28 / 29FY26FY27FY28FY29
1 — No millage (what happened)$12M / $7M / $7M13.52%14.42%13.96%14.03%
2 — Millage passes$12M / $7M / $7M13.52%18.61%18.27%18.48%
3 — Millage passes, smaller cuts$12M / $3M / $3M13.52%18.61%15.88%16.07%

Read together: the millage was never the difference between cutting and not cutting in FY27 — $12 million comes out either way. What it bought was the ability to cut $3 million instead of $7 million in each of the two years after that, and a fund balance in the 18s instead of the 14s.

General Fund Scenarios, 4-year — Board of Education, July 22, 2026

1 page · PDF · presented at the Regular Meeting of the Board of Education, July 22, 2026. Retrieved from the district document archive.

3a. The budget the Board adopted

What the Board adopted for FY2027, what it assumes, and the tax rates that go with it.

Adopted June 16, 2026 for the fiscal year that began July 1. The General Fund is the operating budget — salaries, benefits, instruction, buildings, buses. It is separate from the bond and sinking fund money that pays for construction, which by law cannot be spent on operations.

General Fund — Troy School District
 FY2026 originalFY2026 amend. #3FY2027 proposed
Revenue$190,545,984$202,153,044$191,055,509
Expenditures$194,285,613$207,641,522$193,342,088
Change in fund balance$(3,739,629)$(5,488,478)$(2,286,579)
Beginning fund balance$32,979,691$33,713,795$28,225,317
Ending fund balance$29,240,062$28,225,317$25,938,738
As % of expenditures15.05%13.59%13.42%

What the FY2027 budget assumes

  • 11,869 blended FTE students, down from 12,069 — a loss of 200 students.
  • The lowest per-pupil increase among the Governor's, House's and Senate's proposals — $250 — and the lowest figure proposed for each categorical grant. Budgeting to the floor of the range is a deliberately conservative choice.
  • $12,000,000 of expenditure reductions, already netted into the $193.3M expenditure line. Without them the number would be $205.3M.
The state budget came in above the assumption

Michigan's FY2026-27 school aid budget was signed on July 21, 2026 at a $10,300 per-pupil basic foundation allowance. By the District's July 22 scenario sheet, final state revenue is $193,155,509 — about $2.1 million more than the June assumption. That turns the projected FY2027 fund balance change from −$2,286,579 into −$186,579: very close to break-even, after the $12M of cuts.

The tax rates that go with it

Levied for 2026-27. Only the hold-harmless rate moves with the District's own decisions; the rest are fixed by statute or by voter-approved debt.

LevyMillsFalls on
Operating18.0000Non-homestead property
Commercial personal property8.4102Business equipment
Hold harmless2.4102Homestead (down from 2.5796 and 2.7294)
Debt retirement6.1000All property — bond repayment
Sinking fund0.9473All property — capital repair

Hold harmless is the mechanism that matters for question 3c. Troy is one of a minority of Michigan districts allowed to levy a local homestead tax on top of the state foundation allowance, because it was spending above the state formula when Proposal A passed in 1994. It is why Troy's per-pupil foundation allowance is $11,086 in FY2027 while the state basic is $10,300.

Budget Amendment #3 and FY2027 Proposed Budget — June 16, 2026

29 pages · PDF · the truth-in-taxation hearing, millage rates, final FY2026 amendments and the FY2027 proposal for every fund.

FY2027 Budget Adoption Resolutions — June 16, 2026

The appropriation resolution itself: ten funds, and the millage rates in the table above.

3b. The $12 million in cost reductions

All 37 proposals, with the scores and tiers the administration gave them.

On June 1, 2026 the administration gave the Board a document titled Budget Reduction Scenario, marked "DOCUMENT IS IN PROGRESS." It contains 37 proposals, each scored against six weighted criteria and sorted into three tiers. Everything in this section comes out of that document, reproduced in full.

Reduction goal
$12.0M
FY2027
Scenario total
$11.64M
$360,649 short
Proposals
37
across 11 areas · 36 itemised
Average score
4.32
out of 5.0

Where the money comes from

Proposed annual savings by department
37 proposals · $11,639,351 total
Special education accounts for $3.23 million across 8 of the 37 proposals — more than any other single function. The District's note on that is quoted below.

How the proposals were scored

Each proposal was rated 1–5 on six criteria; the weighted total sets its tier. A 5 means minimal negative impact, high feasibility, broad support; a 1 means severe impact or legal risk and widespread opposition.

CriterionWeightWhat a high score means
Impact on student learning30%Minimal disruption to core learning
Equity impact20%Does not fall disproportionately on high-need students
Legal / compliance risk15%Complies with law, policy and labor agreements
Cost savings amount15%Substantial, recurring savings
Feasibility / timeline10%Can be done in time with existing capacity
Stakeholder support10%Staff and families will understand it
TierScoreSavingsShareMeaning
Tier 1 — Strong candidate4.0–5.0$8,909,72576.5%Recommended for inclusion
Tier 2 — Consider3.0–3.9$2,094,52618.0%Needs planning or phasing
Tier 3 — High riskbelow 3.0$635,1005.5%Needs further study or redesign

Every proposal on the list

Click a column heading to sort. This is the detailed proposal list from the June 1 document, transcribed verbatim, with each area's savings reconciled against the document's own summary table.

One thing doesn't add up, and it isn't mine

The document's summary counts 37 proposals and lists 5 under Secondary. Its detailed list contains 36, with 4 under Secondary. Every dollar figure still reconciles — Secondary's four line items sum to exactly the $1,687,800 the summary reports, and all 36 sum to $11,639,351 — so a proposal appears to be counted in the summary without a row in the detail, or carries no savings. On a document stamped "DOCUMENT IS IN PROGRESS" that is unremarkable, but it is worth knowing that the public list is one item short of the public count.

Area Proposal Savings Score Tier
Total — 36 itemised$11,639,3514.32 avg
The District's note on special education

"Special education remains one of our highest priorities and largest areas of investment in the district. […] all special education programs will continue to be staffed in alignment with state and county requirements […] These decisions are guided by each student's Individualized Education Program (IEP) and are mandated to comply with all legal and educational standards."

The same document gives the reason it is on the list at all:

Special education cost, as presented to the Board
 2018-192024-25Change
Cost — IEP & non-IEP$16,744,610$29,210,999+$12,466,389 (+74%)
Students served1,3321,367+35 (+3%)

Cost per special education student rose from about $12,571 to about $21,369 in six years. Whether that reflects rising need, a state-driven shift in service delivery, or something the District controls is exactly the kind of thing worth an opinion in the box below.

Budget Reduction Scenario — Board of Education workshop, June 1, 2026

5 pages · PDF · marked "DOCUMENT IS IN PROGRESS." The source for every figure in this section. Items the Board flagged for further conversation are printed in red in the original.

3c. Students from outside Troy — what each one is actually worth

The District calls it Schools of Choice. What the state actually pays, the rule almost nobody mentions, eighteen years of demand, and a calculator you can drive.

This is the part almost nobody has run the numbers on, so I did.

Sections 105 and 105c of Michigan's State School Aid Act let a district enroll students who live somewhere else and count them in its own membership, without the home district's permission. Section 105 covers students from other districts inside Oakland County. Section 105c covers students from districts in a neighboring county's ISD — Macomb, Wayne, Livingston, Genesee, Lapeer, Washtenaw. Participation is entirely voluntary, decided by the Board every year, and the District chooses the grades, the buildings, and the number of seats.

The rule that changes the whole calculation

Per the Michigan Department of Education: "School districts that enroll nonresident students under Section 105 or 105c receive the lesser of their own foundation allowance or the foundation allowance of the district of residence."

Troy's FY2027 foundation allowance is $11,086, because Troy is a hold-harmless district. The state basic allowance — what most Oakland County districts get — is $10,300. So for a choice student from an at-basic district, Troy receives $10,300, not $11,086. Every Schools of Choice student is worth $786 less than a Troy resident sitting in the same chair.

That is a 7.1% haircut. It does not make the students unprofitable — it makes them about 93 cents on the dollar. Any estimate that multiplies students by $11,086 is too high by roughly $786 apiece, which at 1,200 students is $943,000 a year of revenue that was never there.

What Troy does today

Troy runs what the resolutions call a "Limited" program: a fixed number of seats, only at entry grades. For 2026-27 the Board authorized 116 seats on December 16, 2025 — and only in kindergarten, first grade, and grades 6–8. No high school seats. Several buildings have been closed to open enrollment outright in past years: Barnard, Bemis, Schroeder, Boulan Park, Athens and Troy High.

Seats authorized for 2026-27
Grade§105 (in county)§105c (contiguous ISD)Total
Kindergarten83487
First grade25126
Grades 6–8 combined213
Total1106116

In 2025-26 there were 173 Schools of Choice students in Troy's elementary buildings — 3.54% of elementary enrollment. The concentration is uneven: Hill Elementary is at 10.57%, Wass at 6.35%, Wattles at 5.54%; Schroeder is at 0.00% and Bemis at 0.24%.

Eighteen years of demand

Kindergarten Schools of Choice: seats offered, applications received, students enrolled
Troy School District, 2008-09 through 2025-26
Across all eighteen years the District advertised 1,114 kindergarten seats, received 2,300 applications, and enrolled 1,103 kindergarteners. Applications have never exceeded 188 in a single year — and when Troy advertised 160 seats in 2011-12 it received 142 applications. Demand is real, but it is not unlimited, and it does not scale with the number of seats offered.
Table view — the same data
YearKdg. seatsKdg. applicationsKdg. enrolled
Total1,1142,3001,103

Who choice students are

2025-26, elementary buildings. This matters because it is the cost side of the ledger, and because it is a fair question whether the District should be thinking about these students as revenue at all.

 Choice studentsResident studentsDifference
Free / reduced lunch54.34%28.91%+25.4 pts
Special education19.65%13.87%+5.8 pts
English learners10.98%24.92%−13.9 pts

The special education gap is the one with a price tag. Troy spends about $21,369 per special education student against a district-wide General Fund average of about $16,290 — a gap of roughly $5,079. An extra 5.8 percentage points of special education share therefore costs on the order of $294 per choice student. The higher free/reduced-lunch share cuts the other way: it draws additional Section 31a at-risk funding. The lower English-learner share reduces EL service cost. Net, the demographic mix is worth a few hundred dollars per student — real, but an order of magnitude smaller than the $786 foundation haircut.

Run the numbers yourself

Defaults are set to the District's own figures and to the premise in question 3 — about 1,100–1,300 students, or roughly 10% of enrollment. Move anything you disagree with.

Beyond today's roughly 175. The 10%-of-enrollment premise is about 1,200.
The lesser of Troy's allowance and the sending district's. Almost every Oakland district is at the state basic.
Enrollment is falling by about 200 a year, so some choice students cost nothing extra to seat. The rest need a new section.
Troy elementary sections run in the mid-20s.
The District's own June 1 numbers imply $87,000 (10 secondary FTE for $870,000) to $156,600 (5 elementary FTE for $783,000).
The special education / at-risk / EL mix, derived above at about $294. Set it higher if you think the mix is worse than the District's own data shows.
The ramp. Today's authorization is 116 seats; the District actually enrolled 62 in 2025-26.
Net annual contribution at steady state
Gross foundation revenue
New sections needed
Extra support cost
Net per year
Per student, net
Years to reach it
vs. the failed millage ($8.1M/yr)
vs. the FY27 cut target ($12.0M)
vs. FY28 & FY29 cuts ($7.0M/yr)
Two things the calculator can't fix

It takes years, not months. Choice students enter at kindergarten and, by statute, may stay until they graduate. Filling every one of the 116 authorized seats every year builds toward the target one grade at a time — see the ramp below. Nothing here helps with the $12 million due in FY2027.

You cannot un-enroll them. A student admitted under §105 or §105c has the right to remain through graduation, and their siblings get first claim on future seats. This is a thirteen-year commitment made one year at a time.

The ramp, year by year

At the rate set above, holding every student to graduation
YearCumulative choice studentsGross revenueNet contribution
The honest summary

At the District's own authorization of 116 seats a year, held to graduation across thirteen grades, the steady-state population is roughly 1,200–1,500 students — which is where the "10% of enrollment, 1,100–1,300 students" figure comes from. It checks out. At $10,300 apiece that is $12.4 million a year gross and, on the default assumptions above, about $8.8 million net — coincidentally almost exactly the $8.1 million the enhancement millage would have raised.

But it arrives over about a decade, only if every seat fills every year, and only if the applications show up. In 2025-26 Troy advertised 52 kindergarten seats, received 59 applications, and enrolled 37. Getting to 116 filled seats a year — let alone more — means opening grades and buildings that are currently closed, and competing for families the District has not historically courted.

That is the actual question: not whether the money is real — it is — but whether Troy wants to be a district that recruits.

Schools of Choice Recommendations for 2026-27 — Board workshop, December 9, 2025

10 pages · PDF · the enrollment projections, the eighteen-year application history, the building-by-building and demographic breakdowns, and the administration's seat recommendation. The source for every Schools of Choice figure on this page.

One caveat I want to be straight about. Troy's hold-harmless levy is recalculated every year from enrollment, taxable values and the foundation allowance. How adding several hundred nonresident students — who generate the lower allowance — interacts with that calculation is a question for the District's business office, and I have not been able to resolve it from public documents. It could move the per-student figure in either direction. Everything else on this page is straight out of the sources listed at the bottom.

The gift card, the $500, and the fine print

Gift card rules, the $500 match and the filing behind it, and what happens to your answers.

$100 Amazon.com gift card drawing

  • No purchase or payment of any kind is necessary.
  • How to enter: submit a response to this survey with contact information, on or before 11:59 p.m. Eastern on Thursday, October 22, 2026. One entry per person. Duplicate entries are removed before the drawing.
  • Eligibility: 18 or older and a resident of Michigan. Employees and Board members of Troy School District are welcome to respond to the survey but are not eligible for the drawing.
  • The drawing: one winner, selected at random from all eligible entries, on or about Monday, October 26, 2026. Odds depend on the number of entries. The winner is notified using the contact information they left, and has 14 days to respond before an alternate is drawn.
  • Prize: one $100 Amazon.com gift card. No substitution or cash equivalent. Any tax is the winner's responsibility. The winner's name is not published unless they say it's fine.
  • Sponsor: Alex Karpowitsch, Troy, Michigan — personally, and at my own expense. Amazon is not a sponsor of, and has no involvement in, this drawing.
  • If you don't want to be entered, leave the contact box blank, or write "no drawing" in it. Your answers still count.

The $500 to the Troy Foundation for Educational Excellence

The committee behind the Yes campaign reported a $500 contribution from Richard Machesky, received June 26, 2026. Troy's Superintendent is Dr. Richard M. Machesky — though the filing lists this contributor as "not employed" at a Chesterfield Township address, so the record is below and you can judge it for yourself.

I am matching it. $500 of my own to the Troy Foundation for Educational Excellence, a 501(c)(3) that funds classroom grants for Troy students. It isn't contingent on anything — not on how many responses come in, or what they say — and I'll post the receipt here when it's made.

Contribution record number 4727 from the committee's pre-election statement. Date of receipt 06/26/2026. Amount 500.00. Cumulative 500.00. Name: Richard Machesky. Occupation: Not employed. Employer: None. Street address redacted. City: Chesterfield Towns, State MI. Type of contribution: Direct.
Record #4727, page 71 of the pre-election statement filed with the Oakland County Elections Division on July 24, 2026 by YES for Stronger Neighborhood Schools. The street address is redacted here; nothing else is altered, and the filing is linked in full below.

What happens to your answers

  • Answers are stored on Cloudflare infrastructure and are readable only by me.
  • No IP address is ever stored. A one-way salted hash is kept purely to stop one person submitting a hundred times; it cannot be turned back into an address.
  • After the survey closes I'll publish an aggregated, anonymized write-up on this site and send it to the Board of Education.
  • Your words are passed to board candidates or the District only if you ticked the sharing box, and only with identifying details removed. Left blank, your response is counted in the totals and read by me, and goes no further.
  • Contact information is never published, sold, or shared — including with the District — regardless of that box.
  • Changed your mind, either direction? Email me and I'll act on it.
  • Want your response deleted? Email the address below with enough detail to find it and I'll remove it.